Legal Opinion

Berman v. Karvounis

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided January 2, 1987No. 75, September Term, 1986PublishedCited by 53 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ADKINS, Judge.

In recent years the torts of abuse of process and malicious prosecution have received considerable attention in the appellate courts of Maryland. See e.g., Wood v. Palmer Ford, Inc., 47 Md.App. 692, 425 A.2d 671 (1981); Palmer Ford, Inc. v. Wood, 298 Md. 484, 471 A.2d 297 (1984); Palmer Ford, Inc. v. Wood, 65 Md.App. 390, 500 A.2d 1055 (1985); Keys v. Chrysler Credit Corp., 303 Md. 397, 494 A.2d 200 (1985). In the case before us we revisit this area of law to decide whether the Circuit Court for Baltimore City erred when it dismissed the abuse of process and malicious use of…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Secretary of State of Md. v. Joseph H. Munson Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Sireci v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Robeson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1979
  4. Flaherty v. WeinbergCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
  5. Muller Fuel Oil Co. v. Ins. Co. of N. Amer.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1967

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. Faya v. AlmarazCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
  2. Valentine v. on Target, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
  3. Parker v. Columbia BankCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1992
  4. Morris v. Osmose Wood PreservingCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1995
  5. Samuels v. TschechtelinCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2000

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API