Legal Opinion

Valentine v. on Target, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided April 19, 1999No. 8, Sept. Term, 1997PublishedCited by 131 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KARWACKI, Judge,

Retired, Specially Assigned.

We issued a writ of certiorari in this case to answer the question of what, if any, tort duty a gun store owner owes to third parties to exercise reasonable care in the display and sale of handguns to prevent the theft and the illegal use of the *547handguns by others against third parties. Confining our analysis to the well pleaded facts in the complaint filed by petitioner in the instant case, the issue is properly limited to the determination of whether respondent owed a duty to the petitioner’s decedent. We hold that such a tort duty is not…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Ashburn v. Anne Arundel CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
  2. Faya v. AlmarazCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
  3. Rosenblatt v. Exxon Co., U.S.A.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
  4. Scott v. WatsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1976
  5. Hartford Insurance v. Manor Inn of Bethesda, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1994

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by131 opinions

  1. Lloyd v. General Motors Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
  2. Bourgeois v. Live Nation Entertainment, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2014
  3. Remsburg v. MontgomeryCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2003
  4. Chow v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
  5. Gourdine v. CrewsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2008

126 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API