Sears, Roebuck and Co. v. Nichols
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ELLIS, Justice.
This is a Deceptive Trade Practices-Consumer Protection Act (DTPA) implied warranty case. Appellees sued Sears, Roebuck and Company (Sears) for personal injury damages allegedly resulting from repairs to the appellees’ riding lawn mower. Ap-pellees alleged that Sears was negligent and breached the implied warranty to repair or modify existing tangible goods or property in a good and workmanlike manner, constituting a violation of the DTPA. Tex.Bus. & Com.Code Ann. § 17.41 et seq. Following a non-jury trial, the trial court entered judgment in favor of appellees finding…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Kawasaki Steel Corp. v. MiddletonTexas Supreme Court · 1985
- McKisson v. Sales Affiliates, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1967
- Melody Home Manufacturing Co. v. BarnesTexas Supreme Court · 1987
- Jacob E. Decker & Sons, Inc. v. CappsTexas Supreme Court · 1942
- Chastain v. KoonceTexas Supreme Court · 1985
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by54 opinions
- Deutsch v. Hoover, Bax & Slovacek, L.L.P., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2003
- Pegasus Energy Group, Inc. v. Cheyenne Petroleum Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1999
- Rich v. Olah, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2008
- Heritage Resources, Inc. v. Hill, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2003
- Purvis Oil Corp. v. Hillin, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1994
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.