Legal Opinion

Pierson v. Sewell

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided August 8, 1975No. 11431PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McQUADE, Chief Justice.

This is an action to foreclose a mechanic’s lien. We affirm the judgment of the trial court insofar as it ordered the lien foreclosed. We find that the lien was timely filed and that the lien waiver signed by respondent was of no force or effect. However, we reverse the award of a deficiency judgment against appellants in the event that the proceeds of the foreclosure sale fail to satisfy respondent’s claim, and also reverse that portion of the decree granting respondent a personal judgment against appellants for the amount due for materials and labor supplied.

Appellants…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Mitchell v. FlandroIdaho Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Jorstad v. City of LewistonIdaho Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Guyman v. AndersonIdaho Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Ivie v. PeckIdaho Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Chamberlain v. City of LewistonIdaho Supreme Court · 1912

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. Higginson v. WestergardIdaho Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Wing v. MartinIdaho Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Great Plains Equipment, Inc. v. Northwest Pipeline Corp.Idaho Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Barber v. HonorofIdaho Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Gilbert v. City of CaldwellIdaho Court of Appeals · 1987

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API