Legal Opinion
Bradshaw v. State
Idaho Supreme Court
Decided August 27, 1991No. 18725PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BOYLE, Justice.
This is an appeal from proceedings brought pursuant to the Idaho Hospitalization of Mentally 111 Act, I.C. § 66-329, that resulted in the involuntary commitment and treatment of Douglas Bradshaw. Bradshaw does not appeal the commitment. Rather, he challenged the magistrate’s finding that he lacked the capacity to make informed decisions about treatment and as a result was required to receive medication against his will while confined at State Hospital South.
I
BACKGROUND AND PROCEEDINGS
Bradshaw was involuntarily committed to the custody of the Department of Health and Welfare on…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- United States Parole Commission v. GeraghtySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Murphy v. HuntSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Washington v. HarperSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- In Re the Detention SwansonWashington Supreme Court · 1990
- MacNeil v. Minidoka Memorial HospitalIdaho Supreme Court · 1985
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- In the Matter of B.B., Alleged to Be Seriously Mentally Impaired, B.B.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2013
- McKinney v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1999
- Idaho Schools for Equal Educational Opportunity Ex Rel. Eikum v. Idaho State Board of Education Ex Rel. MossmanIdaho Supreme Court · 1996
- State v. HoyleIdaho Supreme Court · 2004
- Fenn v. NoahIdaho Supreme Court · 2006
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.