Legal Opinion

Rasmussen v. Martin

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided February 22, 1983No. 13429PublishedCited by 90 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BURNETT, Judge.

Victor Hugo once described life as “a perpetual succession of events, to which man submits.” So it must have seemed to the principal parties here. Charles Rasmussen and John Martin entered into a complex series of business transactions, saw their relationship become sour, and then lost important records in a flood. A district court was asked to determine the respective obligations of the parties to each other. The controversy focused upon a joint farming venture and upon a real estate transaction.

With respect to the farming venture, the court found that the parties had settled…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Angleton v. AngletonIdaho Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Shields & Co., Inc. v. GreenIdaho Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Lomas & Nettleton Co. v. Tiger Enterprises, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1978
  4. McCandless v. SchickIdaho Supreme Court · 1963
  5. J.E.T. Development v. Dorsey Construction Co.Idaho Court of Appeals · 1982

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by90 opinions

  1. Sivak v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1986
  2. State v. KysarIdaho Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Barber v. HonorofIdaho Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Gilbert v. City of CaldwellIdaho Court of Appeals · 1987
  5. Ace Realty, Inc. v. AndersonIdaho Court of Appeals · 1984

85 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API