Legal Opinion

Minnesota Mutual Life Insurance Co. v. Anderson

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided August 17, 1993No. C5-93-253PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LANSING, Judge.

An estate appeals the denial of its post-trial motions for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or for a new trial. It assigns as error the court’s denial of its request to amend its pleadings and the court’s refusal to give the jury the estate’s proposed instructions and special verdict form. We affirm.

FACTS

This action has a complex procedural history but essentially narrows in this appeal to a dispute between Robert Fletcher’s estate and Marlys Albrecht, to whom Fletcher was engaged to be married and to whom he purportedly transferred, to repay indebtedness, various…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lamb v. JordanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  2. Bowen v. WillardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
  3. Guaranty State Bank of St. Paul v. LindquistSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  4. Cooke v. BelzerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Burkhardt v. BaileyMichigan Court of Appeals · 2004
  2. Cascades Development of Minnesota, LLC v. National Specialty InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2012
  3. City of Houston v. Morris, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2000
  4. Travertine Corp. v. Lexington-SilverwoodCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003
  5. City of Cloquet v. CrandallCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2012

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API