Legal Opinion

Travertine Corp. v. Lexington-Silverwood

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided October 22, 2003No. A03-210PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WILLIS, Judge.

Appellant challenges the district court’s order granting respondent’s motion to stay arbitration. Because we conclude that appellant received a valid assignment of the compensation due from respondent and that the assignment allows appellant to compel arbitration, we reverse.

FACTS

The underlying dispute in this case concerns the claim of appellant Lexington-Silverwood, L.P. that it was assigned the compensation that James E. Lennon was due under a “management agreement” to which Lennon, George Berkey, and respondent Travertine Corporation, a real-estate development…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Bel-Ray Company, Inc. v. Chemrite (Pty) Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
  3. Rumbin v. Utica Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
  4. Lickteig v. Alderson, Ondov, Leonard & Sween, P.A.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
  5. Johnson v. Piper Jaffray, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1995

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Burkhardt v. BaileyMichigan Court of Appeals · 2004
  2. Life Rehab Services, Inc. v. Allied Property & Casualty InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2007
  3. Allstate Insurance Company v. 411 Help, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API