Legal Opinion

City of Cloquet v. Crandall

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided December 10, 2012No. A12-0391Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ROSS, Judge.

This condemnation appeal concerns only the compensation method and amount; it *650does not concern the authority to condemn or who should receive the compensation. The City of Cloquet exercised its eminent domain authority to take commercial real property that Kerry and Julie Crandall were purchasing under a contract for deed. The district court set the Crandalls’ compensation at $198,000 under the minimum-compensation provisions of Minnesota Statutes section 117.187 (2008), reasoning that contract for deed purchasers are “owners” entitled to minimum compensation as measured by…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Kelo v. City of New LondonSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  2. American Family Insurance Group v. SchroedlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
  3. Moorhead Economic Development Authority v. AndaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
  4. Calhoun County v. Blue Cross Blue ShieldMichigan Court of Appeals · 2012
  5. Swenson v. NickaboineSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API