Legal Opinion

People v. Pierce

California Supreme Court

Decided November 24, 1939No. Crim. 4239PublishedCited by 55 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCurtis, J.

Defendants were convicted in the Superior Court of the County of Los Angeles of the crime of violating subdivision 2 of section 337a of the Penal Code. Said subdivision of said section of the code, reads as follows: 11 Every person, who, whether for gain, hire, reward, or gratuitously, or otherwise, keeps or occupies, for any period of time whatsoever, any room, shed, tenement, tent, booth, building, float, vessel, place, stand or enclosure, of any kind or any part thereof with a book or books, paper or papers, apparatus, device or paraphernalia, for the purpose of recording or registering…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. People v. BeeslyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  2. Ex Parte HornefCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  3. People v. BillCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  4. People v. KinsleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  5. People v. H. Jevne Co.California Supreme Court · 1919

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by55 opinions

  1. People v. MarshallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  2. People v. RobertsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  3. People v. GriffinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  4. People v. GordonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
  5. People v. CodinaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API