Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Hornef

California Supreme Court

Decided October 9, 1908No. Crim. No. 1454PublishedCited by 38 opinions

APPLICATION for a Writ of Habeas Corpus directed to tbe Chief of Police of the City of Oakland. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtAngellotti, J.

The petitioner seeks his discharge from the custody of the chief of police of the city of Oakland, by whom he is imprisoned under a judgment of the police court of the city of Oakland, pronounced upon a conviction of the offense of practicing dentistry, without having a license so to do from the board of dental examiners of the state.

The act of the legislature, upon which the prosecution against petitioner was founded, is an act entitled “An act to insure the better education of practitioners of dental surgery, and to regulate the practice of dentistry in the state of California, providing…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Ex Parte WhitleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  2. State v. AbbeySupreme Court of Vermont · 1856
  3. People v. CollinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  4. State v. Ah ChewNevada Supreme Court · 1881
  5. Territory v. ScottSupreme Court Of The Territory Of Dakota · 1880

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. In Re JinglesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  2. People v. PierceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  3. People v. BillCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  4. People v. SandgrenNew York Court of Appeals · 1951
  5. People v. FowlerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API