Legal Opinion

People v. Beesly

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 9, 1931No. Docket No. 2143PublishedCited by 59 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appellant was charged with violating the State Poison Act by forging a prescription for narcotics and appeals from the judgment of imprisonment in the state prison on the grounds that the court erred in overruling his demurrer to the information and that the sections of the State Poison Act (secs. 7 and 8, Act 5994, General Laws, as amended) upon which the prosecution is based are unconstitutional.

[1] The information charges the defendant with the "crime of violation of the State Narcotic Act" and alleges that defendant, "with intent then and there to obtain narcotic drugs, did wilfully,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. People v. KingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
  2. People v. SampsellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  3. People v. PlumCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  4. People v. KuderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  5. The People v. BonfantiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by59 opinions

  1. People v. MarshallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  2. People v. ChaddCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
  3. People v. GriffinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  4. People v. GordonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
  5. People v. CodinaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API