Application of Dalton
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
JACKSON, Judge.
Appellants have appealed from a decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office affirming a decision of the Primary Examiner finally rejecting claims 12, 13, 15, 16, and 38 of an application, serial No. 435,944, filed March 24, 1942, for “Telefacsimile Recording and Duplicating Paper,” as not reading upon the elected species and in rejecting claims 21, 23 to 26, inclusive, and 39, as unpatentable over a patent to Bjorksten et al., No. 2,188,590, dated January 30, 1940, upon an application, serial No. 188,707, filed February 4, 1938. Claim 37 was allowed.
We…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United Carbon Co. v. Binney & Smith Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Halliburton Oil Well Cementing Co. v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Faulkner v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Application of RipperCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1948
- Application of ShortellCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1949
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Application of ArbeitCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1953
- Application of Myron Pantzer and Milton FeierCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1965
- Application of Le BaronCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1955
- Rosen v. RozanDistrict Court, D. Montana · 1959
- Application of Warren R. AttwoodCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1966
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.