Legal Opinion
Youngs Rubber Corp. v. Allied Latex Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided April 30, 1951No. 21942_1PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CLARK, Circuit Judge.
After trial, the District Court held valid and infringed Patent No. 2,213,113, “Method for Testing Thin Rubber Articles,” issued on August 27, 1940, to plaintiff’s assignor, Arthur M. Youngs, and Patent No. 2,244,-591, “Apparatus for Testing Prophylactic Articles of Thin Rubber,” issued on June 3, 1941, to plaintiff’s assignors, Youngs and James S. Ballantine. 94 F.Supp. 285. Defendant has appealed from the usual interlocutory judgment of injunction and accounting, and denies both validity and infringement. Both patents relate to testing thin rubber articles, most…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Supermarket Equipment Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Sinclair & Carroll Co. v. Interchemical Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
- O'Reilly v. MorseSupreme Court of the United States · 1854
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Kleinman v. Betty Dain Creations, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1951
- Charles R. Pollard, Jr., D. B. A. Lytron Distributing Company, and Plastoid Corporation v. American Phenolic CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1955
- Packwood v. Briggs & Stratton Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1951
- Surgitube Products Corp. And Louis Hochman v. Scholl Mfg. Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1959
- Schild v. JenningsDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1951
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.