Legal Opinion

David v. Portland Water Committee

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided November 10, 1886PublishedCited by 43 opinions

Multnomah County. Defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtThayer, J.

The respondents commenced a suit in the circuit court for Multnomah County, to restrain said “Water Committee ” from constructing certain water works, and from issuing and disposing of .certain bonds, under and in pursuance *105of an act of the legislative assembly of the State of Oregon entitled “ An act to amend an act entitled ‘ An act to incorporate the city of Portland, approved October 24, 1882,’” approved November 25, 1885, claiming that said act was unconstitutional and void, and that the issuing and disposing of said bonds as the obligations of the city of Portland, would render the real…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Drake v. MahaneyMichigan Supreme Court · 1865
  2. People ex rel. Le Roy v. HurlbutMichigan Supreme Court · 1871
  3. Brooklyn Park Commissioners v. ArmstrongNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
  4. Barbier v. ConnollySupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  5. Attorney General v. City of Eau ClaireWisconsin Supreme Court · 1875

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Couey v. AtkinsOregon Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Esberg Cigar Co. v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Higginson v. Treasurer & School House CommissionersMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
  4. McIntire v. ForbesOregon Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Yancy v. ShatzerOregon Supreme Court · 2004

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API