Legal Opinion

Marth v. Kingfisher Commercial Club

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 10, 1914No. 3850PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Error from District Court, Kingfisher County; Action by Franz F. Marth against the Kingfisher Commercial Chib and others. Judgment for defendants; and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

(Ipinion by

RITTENHOUSE, C.

This action was brought against the Kingfisher Commercial Club, a corporation, David Weinburger, A. E. Bracken, Elmer Solomon, FI. T. Davis, and George H. Laing, by Franz F. Marth', to recover damages for personal injuries. It is alleged in plaintiff’s petition that the Kingfisher Commercial Club is a private corporation, .organized under the laws of Oklahoma, and that the other defendants are the duly authorized officers, agents, and representatives of said Commercial Club. It .is further alleged that the object and purpose of said Commercial Club was to build up…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Hough v. Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1880
  2. Indianapolis & St. Louis Railroad v. HorstSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  3. Inland & Seaboard Coasting Co. v. TolsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  4. Railroad Co. v. GladmonSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
  5. Illinois v. Illinois Central RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1902

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Chicago, R. I. & P. R. Co. v. AustinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  2. Watford by Johnston v. Evening Star Newspaper Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1954
  3. Dewitt v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  4. Midland Valley R. Co. v. EzellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  5. St. Louis-S. F. Ry. Co. v. BellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API