Legal Opinion

Coyle v. Smith

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 9, 1911No. 2225PublishedCited by 54 opinions

Action by W. H. Coyle against Thomas P. Smith and others for an injunction.

1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, J.

The following questions are essential for determination:(1) Was the action of the Governor in convoking the Legislature at Oklahoma City valid?(2) Was said legislative body as convoked at said extraordinary session legally constituted?(3) Is a certain act passed at said session, entitled “An act providing for the permanent location of the seat of government and capital of the state of Oklahoma, creating a board of capital commissioners and defining its powers and duties, authorizing the Governor to accept for capital purposes the proceeds of the sale of land or donations from other sources,…

2Cases cited119 opinions

  1. Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
  2. Osborn v. Bank of United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
  3. Butchers' Benevolent Ass'n v. Crescent City Live-Stock Landing & Slaughter-House Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1873
  4. Shively v. BowlbySupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  5. Illinois Central Railroad v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1892

114 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. Coyle v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  2. Boucher v. EngstromAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Sheldon v. Grand River Dam AuthoritySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  4. Pioneer Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  5. State Ex Rel. Kerr v. Grand River Dam AuthoritySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1945

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API