Legal Opinion

Telanus v. Simpson

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided December 31, 1928PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

I. The defendants, appellants, are physicians and surgeons, and this is a malpractice case. The charge is that the defendants operated upon the plaintiff for appendicitis, and in doing so, negligently cut nerves, tissues and muscles of plaintiff's body so that, as a result, his right leg became atrophied and useless. The defendants, in addition to a general denial, and after admitting that they were physicians and surgeons, pleaded as a bar the Statute of Limitations — the act approved March 29, 1921 (Laws 1921, pp. 197, 198). Under this statute, defendants earnestly insist that the plaintiff…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Chawkley v. Wabash Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1927
  2. Cranor v. School District No. 2 of Township No. 62 of Range No. 82Supreme Court of Missouri · 1899
  3. Nelson v. SandellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1926
  4. Brown v. BennettMichigan Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Moon v. St. Louis Transit Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1912

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Laughlin v. ForgraveSupreme Court of Missouri · 1968
  2. Steele v. WoodsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1959
  3. Wentz v. Price Candy Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1943
  4. Williams v. ChamberlainSupreme Court of Missouri · 1958
  5. Rauschelbach v. BenincasaSupreme Court of Missouri · 1963

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API