Rauschelbach v. Benincasa
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
WELBORN, Commissioner.
Jewel and Loran R. Rauschelbach, husband and wife, instituted this action against Dr. A. V. Benincasa and Dr. Jean J. Merz for damages for injuries which were alleged to have resulted from negligence of the defendants in the performance of a surgical operation on Jewel Rauschelbach. In Count I of the petition, Jewel sought damages in the amount of $50,000 and in Count II, her husband asked damages of $10,000.
At the trial, a motion for directed verdict as to Doctor Benincasa was sustained at the conclusion of the plaintiffs’ opening statement. No objection to that action…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Steele v. WoodsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1959
- Maybach v. Falstaff Brewing Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1949
- Pedigo v. RoseberrySupreme Court of Missouri · 1937
- Williams v. ChamberlainSupreme Court of Missouri · 1958
- Stallman v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1953
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Swope v. PrintzSupreme Court of Missouri · 1971
- Yoos v. Jewish Hospital of St. LouisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1982
- Hart v. SteeleSupreme Court of Missouri · 1967
- Delisi v. St. Luke's Episcopal-PresbyTerian Hospital, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1985
- Fisher v. WilkinsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1964
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.