Legal Opinion

Laughlin v. Forgrave

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided September 9, 1968No. 52919PublishedCited by 94 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HENLEY, Judge.

Action for damages for malpractice against two medical doctors. Verdict and judgment were for plaintiff for $16,000. The court sustained defendants’ after-trial motion for judgment in accordance with their motion for directed verdict, set aside the verdict and judgment, and entered judgment for defendants. Plaintiff appeals. We affirm.

The issue presented on appeal is whether this action is barred by the two year statute of limitation, § 516.140.1 Involved in that issue is the question: when does the statute of limitation begin to run in malpractice actions ? Does it begin to run…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Urie v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Ayers v. MorganSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  3. Fernandi v. StrullySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1961
  4. Krug v. Sterling Drug, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1967
  5. Thatcher v. De TarSupreme Court of Missouri · 1943

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by94 opinions

  1. Anderson v. WagnerIllinois Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Kenyon v. HammerArizona Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Mahoney v. Doerhoff Surgical Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1991
  4. Myrick v. JamesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1982
  5. Blaske v. Smith & Entzeroth, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1991

89 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API