Legal Opinion

Wentz v. Price Candy Co.

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided November 1, 1943No. 38516PublishedCited by 61 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDouglas, P. J.

This is a proceeding under the Work-

men’s Compensation Act certified to this court by the Kansas City Court of Appeals on the ground its decision is contrary to decisions of the St. Louis Court of Appeals. 168 S. W. (2d) 462. We consider the case as we would a direct appeal. Const. Art. YI, Amd. 1884, Sec. 6.

Appellant’s employment by respondent Candy Company was within the Compensation Act. She was injured on April 26, 1941. At that time the statute required claims to be filed with the Compensation Commission within six months from the date of injury. Sec. 3727, R. S. 1939. Accordingly, she…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Clark v. Kansas City, St. Louis & Chicago RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1909
  2. Barker v. Hannibal & St. Joseph RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1886
  3. Wheeler v. Missouri Pacific Railroad Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1931
  4. Cytron v. St. Louis Transit Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1907
  5. Schrabauer v. Schneider Engraving Product, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1930

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by61 opinions

  1. Linda Jasperson, Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Purolator Courier Corp., Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
  2. Doe v. Roman Catholic Diocese of Jefferson CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1993
  3. Frazee v. PartneySupreme Court of Missouri · 1958
  4. City of Kirkwood v. AllenSupreme Court of Missouri · 1966
  5. Darrah v. FosterSupreme Court of Missouri · 1962

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API