Legal Opinion

In Re the Welfare of J.W.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 4, 1987No. C9-87-165, C5-87-194PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SIMONETT, Justice.

This appeal raises questions about the protection to be afforded parents of neglected children who invoke their Fifth Amendment privilege with respect to a court-ordered treatment plan requiring them to make incriminating disclosures as part of their rehabilitation therapy. We reverse, noting, however, that the privilege does not protect against the possible adverse consequences of a failure to undergo effective therapy.

The ease is here for the second time. The parents’ first appeal was from the trial court’s decision finding their two children to be dependent and neglected.…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Minnesota v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Lefkowitz v. TurleySupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Gardner v. BroderickSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Lefkowitz v. CunninghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Farrell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. In Re Daniel D.West Virginia Supreme Court · 2002
  2. State v. P.Z.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1997
  3. In re M.C.P.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1989
  4. In Re the Welfare of M.D.O.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  5. People v. Eugene W.Illinois Supreme Court · 2008

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API