Legal Opinion

Farrell v. United States

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided April 4, 1949No. 267PublishedCited by 388 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Jackson

Petitioner, a seaman, brought suit in admiralty to recover damages under the Jones Act, 41 Stat. 1007, 46 U. S. C. § 688, and maintenance, cure and wages under maritime law. The issue of negligence was decided against him by both courts below and the claim is abandoned here. Petition for certiorari to review other issues was granted. 335 U. S. 869.

I. Maintenance and Cure.

The facts which occasion maintenance and cure for this seaman are not in dispute. The claimant, 22 years of age and in good health, was a member of the Merchant Marine. He was in the service of the S. S. James E. Haviland, a…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Calmar Steamship Corp. v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Aguilar v. Standard Oil Co. of NJSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. The Bouker No. 2Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1917
  4. Jones v. Waterman SS CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1946
  5. Hust v. Moore-McCormack Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by388 opinions

  1. Lauritzen v. LarsenSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  2. Mitchell v. Trawler Racer, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  3. Fitzgerald v. United States Lines Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Usner v. Luckenbach Overseas Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Usner v. Luckenbach Overseas Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971

383 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API