Legal Opinion

People v. Eugene W.

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided September 18, 2008No. 104854 & 104871 cons. RelPublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Kilbride

Chief Justice Fitzgerald and Justices Freeman, Thomas, Garman, Karmeier, and Burke concurred in the judgment and opinion.

OPINION

The circuit court of Peoria County found A.W., a minor, neglected and made him a ward of the court. Eugene W, the minor’s father, appealed. The appellate court upheld the neglect and unfitness findings, but vacated and remanded the cause, finding a violation of Eugene’s fifth amendment right against self-incrimination because he was not allowed to complete sex offender counseling without admitting he committed a sex offense. 373 Ill. App. 3d 574.

We allowed and…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Lefkowitz v. CunninghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Allen v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. People v. SutherlandIllinois Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Ballweg v. City of SpringfieldIllinois Supreme Court · 1986
  5. People v. TennerIllinois Supreme Court · 2003

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Hukic v. Aurora Loan ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
  2. People v. HopkinsIllinois Supreme Court · 2009
  3. State Building Venture v. O'DonnellIllinois Supreme Court · 2010
  4. The Hope Clinic for Women, Ltd. v. FloresIllinois Supreme Court · 2013
  5. Hurlbert v. CharlesIllinois Supreme Court · 2010

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API