Legal Opinion
In re M.C.P.
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided December 8, 1989No. 87-074PublishedCited by 92 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDooley, J.
The mother and father, D.P. and R.P. (parents), appeal the juvenile court’s finding that their adopted daughter M.C.P. (juvenile) is a child in need of care and supervision and the court’s disposition order granting legal custody to the Department of Social and Rehabilitation Services. The mother, D.P., argues: (1) the parties seeking termination of parental rights failed to comply with the notice requirement of the Indian Child Welfare Act, 25 U.S.C. § 1912(a) (1982 & Supp. IV 1986), even though the trial court knew that the juvenile was an Indian child; (2) the trial court failed to issue…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Kastigar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Minnesota v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians v. HolyfieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Lefkowitz v. CunninghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- In re J.R.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1989
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by92 opinions
- State v. P.Z.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1997
- Mullin v. PhelpsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1994
- Department of Social & Health Services v. GilfillenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
- Dwayne P. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- In re B.S.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1997
87 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.