Legal Opinion

Doyle v. Department of Real Estate

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 30, 1994No. A065627PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MERRILL, J.

Factual and Procedural Background

Real parties in interest James and Alice Porsche (the Porsches) filed a complaint in the municipal court alleging one cause of action for “fraud and deceit” against appellant Marvin D. Doyle, a licensed real estate broker, arising out of a real estate transaction. The Porsches prayed for damages in the amount of $15,000. The case went to judicial arbitration, and the Porsches were awarded $15,000. Doyle filed a request for a trial de novo.

The parties then agreed to a settlement of the matter. Doyle was to pay the Porsches $10,000 within a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Brown v. Kelly Broadcasting Co.California Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Merrifield v. EdmondsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
  3. Vinci v. EdmondsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Rodriguez v. Department of Real EstateCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
  2. Yergan v. Department of Real EstateCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
  3. Worthington v. DaviCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  4. Mason v. Department of Real EstateCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
  5. Alves v. WeberCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API