Doyle v. Department of Real Estate
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MERRILL, J.
Factual and Procedural Background
Real parties in interest James and Alice Porsche (the Porsches) filed a complaint in the municipal court alleging one cause of action for “fraud and deceit” against appellant Marvin D. Doyle, a licensed real estate broker, arising out of a real estate transaction. The Porsches prayed for damages in the amount of $15,000. The case went to judicial arbitration, and the Porsches were awarded $15,000. Doyle filed a request for a trial de novo.
The parties then agreed to a settlement of the matter. Doyle was to pay the Porsches $10,000 within a…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Brown v. Kelly Broadcasting Co.California Supreme Court · 1989
- Merrifield v. EdmondsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- Vinci v. EdmondsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
3Cited by5 opinions
- Rodriguez v. Department of Real EstateCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- Yergan v. Department of Real EstateCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
- Worthington v. DaviCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- Mason v. Department of Real EstateCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- Alves v. WeberCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2025