Deptula v. Horace Mann Insurance
Supreme Court of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
BERGER, Justice.
In this appeal, we consider whether a claimant may recover under two under-insured motorist policies if one of those policies establishes that the tortfeasor’s automobile is an “underinsured motor vehicle,” as defined by statute. To qualify as an underinsured motor vehicle, the limits of bodily injury coverage available to the tortfeasor must be less than the limits provided by the claimant’s underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage. In Colonial Ins. Co. of Wisconsin v. Ayers, 1 this Court addressed the threshold question of whether a claimant may stack the coverage provided by…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Hurst v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Delaware · 1995
- Colonial Ins. Co. of Wisconsin v. AyersSupreme Court of Delaware · 2001
- Nationwide Mutual Automobile Insurance v. PeeblesSupreme Court of Delaware · 1997
3Cited by7 opinions
- Dunlap v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2005
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. PattersonSupreme Court of Delaware · 2010
- Barley Mill, LLC v. Save Our County, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2014
- Kent v. Nationwide Property & Casualty InsuranceSuperior Court of Delaware · 2004
- Dunlap v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2005
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.