Legal Opinion

Kent v. Nationwide Property & Casualty Insurance

Superior Court of Delaware

Decided March 10, 2004No. C.A. 02C-12-094 SCDPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DEL PESCO, J.

Plaintiff, Nadine Kent (“Kent”), an insured of defendant Nationwide Property and Casualty Insurance Company (“Nationwide”), seeks' uninsured insurance benefits pursuant to her policy of insurance. Kent was injured in the State of New Jersey by a tortfeasor who had insurance. The tortfeasor’s insurance company has refused Kent’s claim for noneconomic damages on the grounds that her injuries do not meet the verbal threshold requirements of that State’s insurance statute which immunizes the tortfeasor from such a claim. 1

The question presented in this motion for summary…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Burkhart v. DaviesSupreme Court of Delaware · 1991
  2. Travelers Indemnity Co. v. LakeSupreme Court of Delaware · 1991
  3. Hallowell v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Delaware · 1982
  4. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. GilletteWisconsin Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Emmons v. Hartford Underwriters InsuranceSupreme Court of Delaware · 1997

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. PattersonSupreme Court of Delaware · 2010
  2. Harper v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanySuperior Court of Delaware · 2022
  3. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. PattersonSupreme Court of Delaware · 2010
  4. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. PattersonSupreme Court of Delaware · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API