Legal Opinion

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Patterson

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided November 8, 2010No. 32, 2010PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RIDGELY, Justice,

for the Majority:

This action involves a dispute over Delaware uninsured motorist (“UM”) benefits. Aneita Patterson is a Delaware resident who was injured while driving her automobile in New Jersey. A New Jersey resident, Jean Armstrong, was at fault for the collision. Patterson filed a claim against Armstrong’s insurance carrier, Allstate. Allstate denied the claim. Patterson then brought this action for uninsured motorist benefits against her Delaware insurance carrier, State Farm. State Farm moved for summary judgment on the ground that Patterson was not “legally entitled…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Matter of Allstate Ins. Co.(stolarz-Njm)New York Court of Appeals · 1993
  2. In re the Arbitration between Allstate Insurance & StolarzNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
  3. Travelers Indemnity Co. v. LakeSupreme Court of Delaware · 1991
  4. Ohayon v. Safeco InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Hague v. Allstate Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. GMG Capital Investments, LLC v. Athenian Venture Partners ISupreme Court of Delaware · 2012
  2. Taylor v. Diamond State Port Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2011
  3. Riverbend Community, LLC v. Green Stone Engineering, LLCSupreme Court of Delaware · 2012
  4. Smith v. Delaware State UniversitySupreme Court of Delaware · 2012
  5. Scott Pontone v. Milso Industries CorporationCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2014

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API