Legal Opinion

Colonial Ins. Co. of Wisconsin v. Ayers

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided April 27, 2001No. 92, 2000, 121, 2000, 127, 2000, 128, 2000, 134, 2000, 135, 2000PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOLLAND, Justice,

for the majority:

For purposes of summary judgment only, the Superior Court consolidated Colonial Ins. Co. v. Ayers, C.A. No. 99C-05-009, with Hartford Underwriters Insurance Company v. Foskey, C.A. No. 99C-08-002. Both cases involve similar legal issues relating to different insurance company defendants. The parties stipulated to the faets. The Superior Court granted the plaintiffs’ motions for summary judgment. This Court accepted separate interlocutory appeals by the insurance company defendants and consolidated these proceedings.

The threshold issue in both cases is whether…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Connolly v. Royal Globe InsuranceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1983
  2. Hudson v. State Farm Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Delaware · 1990
  3. Hurst v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Delaware · 1995
  4. C & T Associates, Inc. v. Government of New Castle CountyCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1979
  5. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Clarendon National InsuranceSupreme Court of Delaware · 1992

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Dunlap v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2005
  2. Reid v. SpazioSupreme Court of Delaware · 2009
  3. Doroshow, Pasquale, Krawitz & Bhaya v. Nanticoke Memorial Hospital, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2012
  4. Acadia Brandywine Town Center, LLC v. New Castle CountySupreme Court of Delaware · 2005
  5. Deptula v. Horace Mann InsuranceSupreme Court of Delaware · 2004

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API