Legal Opinion
Hurst v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance
Supreme Court of Delaware
Decided January 11, 1995No. 456, 1993PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HOLLAND, Justice:
The petitioner-appellant, Suzanne Hurst (“Hurst”), was injured, during the course of her employment, while driving a motor vehicle owned by her employer. Hurst was involved in a collision caused by the negligence of a third-party tortfeasor, an uninsured motorist. The sole question presented in this appeal is whether Hurst’s personal uninsured motorist insurance carrier, the defendant-ap-pellee, Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company (“Nationwide”), is entitled to a set-off against its policy limits for payments made by Hurst’s employer’s uninsured motorist insurance carrier,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State Automobile Mutual Insurance v. YoulerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1990
- Frank v. Horizon Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1989
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. KennerSupreme Court of Delaware · 1990
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. ArmsSupreme Court of Delaware · 1984
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. AbramowiczSupreme Court of Delaware · 1978
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Dunlap v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2005
- Tackett v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1995
- Colonial Ins. Co. of Wisconsin v. AyersSupreme Court of Delaware · 2001
- Farmers Insurance Exchange v. HurleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
- Deakyne v. Selective Insurance Co. of AmericaSuperior Court of Delaware · 1997
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.