State v. Landsiedel

¶1 Landsiedel argues the trial court abused its discretion in concluding he was ineligible for a SSOSA. He claims he is eligible for a SSOSA, because his wife satisfied the statutory definition of “victim” when she suffered emotional or psychological harm as a result of his Internet crimes against children. But, such a statutory interpretation, while literally correct, would render other portions of the statute meaningless or superfluous. We affirm.

FACTS

¶2 In 2009, Nicholas Landsiedel was convicted of attempted rape of a child in the second degree and communication with a minor for immoral…