Legal Opinion

State v. Cannon

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 19, 1996No. 62416-0PublishedCited by 63 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAlexander, J.

— Victor Cannon appeals his conviction and sentence on a charge of rape in the first degree, contending that the trial court erred in allowing so-called DNA evidence to be admitted into evidence at his bench trial. He also assigns error to the trial court’s refusal to grant his motion to dismiss the rape charge for alleged violations of the time for trial and discovery rules. Finally, he challenges the trial court’s imposition of an exceptional sentence. We affirm the trial court in all respects.

*318In the early morning hours of May 25, 1990, G.S. was driving alone in her Camaro in south Seattle.…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
  3. State v. CopelandWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Havens v. C & D PLASTICS, INC.Washington Supreme Court · 1994
  5. State v. CauthronWashington Supreme Court · 1993

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by63 opinions

  1. State v. MichielliWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  2. State v. WoodsWashington Supreme Court · 2001
  3. State v. TiliWashington Supreme Court · 2003
  4. State v. TiliWashington Supreme Court · 2003
  5. State v. CannonWashington Supreme Court · 1996

58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API