State v. Grayson
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
¶1 We are asked to determine whether John Grayson received sufficient consideration of his request for a drug offender sentencing alternative (DOSA) as part of his sentence for delivery of crack cocaine. Under the Sentencing Reform Act of 1981 (SRA), chapter 9.94ARCW, whether to give a DOSA is a decision left to the discretion of the trial judge, and our review of that exercise of discretion is limited. However, while the SRA vests broad discretion in the hands of the trial judge, the trial judge must still exercise this discretion in conformity with the law.
Chambers, J.
¶2 In this case, the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- State v. AmmonsWashington Supreme Court · 2005
- E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co. v. CollinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Hillis v. Department of EcologyWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- Hillis v. State, Dept. of EcologyWashington Supreme Court · 1997
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by123 opinions
- State v. Houston-SconiersWashington Supreme Court · 2017
- State v. O'DellWashington Supreme Court · 2015
- State v. MendozaWashington Supreme Court · 2009
- State v. MendozaWashington Supreme Court · 2009
- In re the Personal Restraint of MulhollandWashington Supreme Court · 2007
118 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.