Legal Opinion
State v. Osman
Washington Supreme Court
Decided August 3, 2006No. 76948-6PublishedCited by 71 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*477¶1
Fairhurst, J.
— Semi Osman seeks review of a published Court of Appeals decision upholding the trial court’s imposition of a standard range sentence. Osman claims that the trial court violated the Sentencing Reform Act of 1981 (SRA), chapter 9.94A RCW, the equal protection clause of the fourteenth amendment to the United States Constitution, and article I, section 12 of the Washington Constitution by denying his request for a sentence under the special sex offender sentencing alternative (SSOSA), former RCW 9.94A.120(8)(a) (2000), recodified as RCW 9.94A.670(4) by Laws of 2000, chapter 28,…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Plyler v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Jones v. North Carolina Prisoners' Labor Union, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Graham v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Mathews v. DiazSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Baxstrom v. HeroldSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by71 opinions
- State v. MutchWashington Supreme Court · 2011
- State v. OsmanWashington Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. SimsWashington Supreme Court · 2011
- Martinez-Cuevas v. DeRuyter Bros. Dairy, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2020
- State v. SimsWashington Supreme Court · 2011
66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.