Bearup v. Bearup
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HATHAWAY, Judge.
This appeal attacks a judgment for appellee on his claim for malicious prosecution and denial of appellant’s motions for judgment n. o. v. or for new trial conditioned on appellee’s consent to a remittitur. Because appellee failed to establish the essential element of a favorable termination of the criminal prosecution, we reverse.
Appellee is president of Lake Plastics Corporation. Appellant, appellee’s uncle, rented equipment to the corporation. On May 27, 1975, appellant received a check of $300 for equipment rental, signed by the corporate secretary, and drawn on the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Jaffe v. StoneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Slade v. City of PhoenixArizona Supreme Court · 1975
- Overson v. LynchArizona Supreme Court · 1957
- Tate v. ConnelCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1966
- Associates Finance Corporation v. ScottCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1966
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Von Bulow Ex Rel. Auersperg v. Von BulowDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1987
- Union Oil of California, Amsco Div. v. WatsonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
- Carl West v. City of MesaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- West v. City of MesaDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2015
- Buonarigo v. BJ's Tavern LLCDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2021
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.