Legal Opinion

Bearup v. Bearup

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided March 26, 1979No. 2 CA-CIV 2884PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HATHAWAY, Judge.

This appeal attacks a judgment for appellee on his claim for malicious prosecution and denial of appellant’s motions for judgment n. o. v. or for new trial conditioned on appellee’s consent to a remittitur. Because appellee failed to establish the essential element of a favorable termination of the criminal prosecution, we reverse.

Appellee is president of Lake Plastics Corporation. Appellant, appellee’s uncle, rented equipment to the corporation. On May 27, 1975, appellant received a check of $300 for equipment rental, signed by the corporate secretary, and drawn on the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Jaffe v. StoneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Slade v. City of PhoenixArizona Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Overson v. LynchArizona Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Tate v. ConnelCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1966
  5. Associates Finance Corporation v. ScottCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1966

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Von Bulow Ex Rel. Auersperg v. Von BulowDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1987
  2. Union Oil of California, Amsco Div. v. WatsonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
  3. Carl West v. City of MesaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
  4. West v. City of MesaDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2015
  5. Buonarigo v. BJ's Tavern LLCDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2021

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API