Associates Finance Corporation v. Scott
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
MOLLOY, Judge.
Appellees, plaintiffs below, have moved this court to dismiss an appeal brought by the defendant, appellant herein, on the ground that the appeal was not timely and that therefore this court lacks jurisdiction to entertain the appeal.
It is well-settled that where an appeal is not timely filed, the appellate court acquires no jurisdiction other than to dismiss the attempted appeal. Harbel Oil Company v. Steele, 80 Ariz. 368, 298 P.2d 789 (1956); Bergman v. Bergman, 1 Ariz. App. 209, 401 P.2d 163 (1965).
A jury verdict against appellant (defendant below) was rendered on April 5,…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- State v. BirminghamArizona Supreme Court · 1964
- Sadler v. Arizona Flour Mills Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1942
- Ginn v. Superior Court, in and for County of PimaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1965
- Black v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1957
- Christian v. CottenCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1965
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Ross v. GiacomoNevada Supreme Court · 1981
- City of Tucson v. WondergemCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1966
- Williams v. WilliamsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1972
- Howard P. Foley Company v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1966
- Bearup v. BearupCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1979
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.