Legal Opinion

Haney v. Farmers Alliance Insurance

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided November 7, 1931No. 29,789PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Burch, J.:

The action was one to recover on a fire insurance policy. A demurrer to plaintiff’s evidence was sustained, and plaintiff appeals.

The Farmers Alliance Insurance Company issued a fire insurance policy to Nataldo Precipio, covering a dwelling house occupied as a homestead, and household goods. Precipio died intestate, leaving his widow as sole heir, and plaintiff was appointed administrator of his estate. Afterwards the insured property burned, and the administrator sued to recover on the policy. The administrator testified that none of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Smith v. Republic County Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1910
  2. Capitol Insurance v. Bank of Blue MoundSupreme Court of Kansas · 1892
  3. Kennedy v. Mennonite Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1915
  4. Hunt v. RemsbergSupreme Court of Kansas · 1911

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Svetlicic v. Farmers Alliance InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1932
  2. Lohr v. Farmers Alliance InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1936
  3. Bussell v. Mennonite Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1933
  4. Lawson v. Brotherhood of American YeomenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1933
  5. Government Employees Insurance v. WineteerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1968

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API