Legal Opinion

Hunt v. Remsberg

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 7, 1911No. 16,725PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Allen district court.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Graves, J.:

This is an action upon an administrator’s; bond to recover insurance money received upon the life of John H. Hunt, and used as a part of his, estate. The *666widow is dead; the plaintiffs are the children of John H. Hunt, deceased. It is claimed that this money belongs exclusively to the children of Hunt, and is no part of the estate of the insured, and that neither the administrator nor the probate court has any right to assume control of or to exercise any dominion over it.

On the 2d day of December, 1897, at Burlington, Iowa, John H. Hunt…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Griswold v. . SawyerNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  2. Johnson v. Van EppsIllinois Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Lodge v. WeldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1885
  4. Cox v. CurwenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1875
  5. Geoffroy v. GilbertNew York Supreme Court · 1895

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Shawnee State Bank v. Royal Union Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1929
  2. Haney v. Farmers Alliance InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1931
  3. Filley v. Illinois Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1914
  4. Hunt v. RemsbergSupreme Court of Kansas · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API