Smith v. Republic County Mutual Fire Insurance
Supreme Court of Kansas
Appeal from Jewell district court; Richard M. PlCKLER, judge.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Burch, J.:
The plaintiff is the assignee of a policy issued by the defendant, a mutual fire, lightning and tornado insurance company organized under the laws of this state. Having suffered a loss, the plaintiff brought suit on the policy. The defense was that he had failed to pay an assessment on the premium note given by his assignor, and consequently that he had forfeited his right to indemnity. He replied that the assessment was illegal. The statute (Laws 1885, ch. Í32, § 15; Gen. Stat. 1909, § 4221) authorized the company to adopt a by-law excluding…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Capitol Insurance v. Bank of Blue MoundSupreme Court of Kansas · 1892
3Cited by7 opinions
- Akers v. Farmers Alliance InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1925
- Haney v. Farmers Alliance InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1931
- Burns v. Alliance Co-operative InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1918
- Kennedy v. Mennonite Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1915
- Kinzer v. National Mutual Insurance Ass'nSupreme Court of Kansas · 1912
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.