Legal Opinion

Kennedy v. Mennonite Mutual Fire Insurance

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided November 6, 1915No. 19,702PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from Coffey district court; William C. Harris, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

*599The opinion of the court was delivered by

Mason, J.:

David Kennedy brought an action upon a policy issued by the Mennonite Mutual Fire Insurance Company of Kansas. Payment was resisted upon the ground that the insured afterwards procured other insurance without the knowledge or consent of the insurer, and that this avoided the policy. The court directed a verdict for the defendant, and the plaintiff appeals.

The taking out -of the other insurance is not disputed. A by-law of the company provided that such act should avoid the policy. The plaintiff contends that this provision was not binding on…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Smith v. Republic County Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1910
  2. Capitol Insurance v. Bank of Blue MoundSupreme Court of Kansas · 1892
  3. Randolph Lumber Co. v. Western Silo Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1914

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Continental Ins. Co. v. RiggsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1939
  2. Kennedy v. Farmers Alliance InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1929
  3. Haney v. Farmers Alliance InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1931
  4. Union Central Life Insurance v. ZehrSupreme Court of Kansas · 1936
  5. Floeck v. United Benefit Life Ins. Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1948

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API