Legal Opinion

Bussell v. Mennonite Mutual Fire Insurance

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided May 6, 1933No. 31,060PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Harvey, J.:

This is an action on a fire insurance policy. A jury was waived. The trial court made findings of fact and rendered judgment for plaintiff. Defendant has appealed.

Plaintiff was the owner of a tract of about fifty acres of improved land in Neosho county. He carried a policy of fire insurance with the defendant on some of the improvements. The Investors Loan & Abstract Co. had a first loan upon the property for $2,000, and T. L. Youmans had a second mortgage for $1,000. On April 14, 1931, plaintiff made application to the defendant for a…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Pettijohn v. Saint Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1917
  2. Kennedy v. Farmers Alliance InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1929
  3. Eikelberger v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1919
  4. Akers v. Farmers Alliance InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1925
  5. Haney v. Farmers Alliance InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1931

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bussman v. Safeco Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Kansas · 2014
  2. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, a Corporation v. Alfred E. BockhorstCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1972
  3. Jackson v. Republic Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API