Legal Opinion

Mills v. City of Dayton

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided January 15, 1985No. 8613PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWeber, J.

This case is on appeal from the decision of the trial court which overruled appellants’ motion for an award of prejudgment interest pursuant to R.C. 1343.03(C). The motion was filed to obtain an award of prejudgment interest on a judgment issued in this matter pursuant to a jury verdict of $20,000 to plaintiff-appellant Michelle Mills and of $5,000 to plaintiff Sharon Mills in a personal injury action. A hearing on the motion was held in the trial court. The trial court held that R.C. 1343.03(C) was unconstitutional, in violation of the due process guarantees of the Ohio and United States…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Huffman v. Hair Surgeon, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Wilfong v. BatdorfOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  3. State ex rel. Holdridge v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Gulf Oil Corp. v. KosydarOhio Supreme Court · 1975
  5. French v. DwigginsOhio Supreme Court · 1984

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Kalain v. SmithOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Galayda v. Lake Hospital Systems, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Glimcher v. ReinhornOhio Court of Appeals · 1991
  4. Fischer v. Dairy Mart Convenience Stores, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1991
  5. LeForge v. Nationwide Mutual Fire InsuranceOhio Court of Appeals · 1992

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API