Legal Opinion

French v. Dwiggins

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided January 11, 1984No. 82-1815PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCelebrezze, C.J.

The critical issue raised by this appeal is whether R.C. 2125.02, as amended effective February 5,1982, will be applied to all actions tried subsequent to the effective date of the amendment. For the reasons to follow, we hold that R.C. 2125.02, as amended, is to be applied to all wrongful death actions tried on or after February 5, 1982.

In Kilbreath v. Rudy (1968), 16 Ohio St. 2d 70 [45 O.O.2d 370], we held as follows:

“1. Section 28, Article II of the Ohio Constitution prohibiting the passage of retroactive laws, has application to laws affecting substantive rights, and has no reference to…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
  2. Balson v. DoddsOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  3. F. Enterprises, Inc. v. Kentucky Fried Chicken Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Kilbreath v. RudyOhio Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Wilfong v. BatdorfOhio Supreme Court · 1983

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. Van Fossen v. Babcock & Wilcox Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Jones v. VIP Development Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Ramage v. Central Ohio Emergency Services, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1992
  4. State v. WallsOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  5. State v. WallsOhio Supreme Court · 2002

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API