State ex rel. Holdridge v. Industrial Commission
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHbRbbet, J.
The compensation of a workman injured in the course of his employment, or compensation to his dependents in the event of his death, is governed by statute. Frequently, such statutes are repealed or repealed and re-enacted as amended. A statute may be substantive or remedial (procedural) or substantive in part and remedial in part.
In the case at bar, it is necessary to examine two statutes— first, Section 1465.81 of the General Code of Ohio, effective at the time of relator’s injury, and, second, Section 4123.58 of the Be-vised Code which is the amended re-enactment of the first statute. The…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Industrial Commission v. KamrathOhio Supreme Court · 1928
- Smith v. New York Central Rd.Ohio Supreme Court · 1930
- State, Ex Rel. v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1937
- Manuel v. Carolina Casualty Insurance CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1961
- State v. ElmoreSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1934
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by61 opinions
- Van Fossen v. Babcock & Wilcox Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1988
- Kunkler v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1988
- Gregory v. FlowersOhio Supreme Court · 1972
- State ex rel. Gassmann v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1975
- Kilbreath v. RudyOhio Supreme Court · 1968
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.