Legal Opinion

Beach v. Ocwen Federal Bank

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided April 22, 1998No. 97-5310PublishedCited by 386 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Souter

Under the Truth in Lending Act, 82 Stat. 146, 16 U. S. C. § 1601 et seq., when a loan made in a consumer credit transaction is secured by the borrower’s principal dwelling, the borrower may rescind the loan agreement if the lender fails to deliver certain forms or to disclose important terms accurately. See 15 U. S. C. § 1635. Under § 1635(f) of the statute, this right of rescission “shall expire” in the usual case three years after the loan eloses or upon the sale of the secured property, whichever date is earlier. The question here is whether a borrower may assert this right to rescind as…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Russello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. United States v. Western Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  3. Mourning v. Family Publications Service, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Burnett v. New York Central RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  5. Bull v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by386 opinions

  1. Jones v. BockSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Palmer v. Champion MortgageCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2006
  3. Young v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  4. R.G. Financial Corp. v. Vergara-NuñezCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2006
  5. Hawaii Community Federal Credit Union v. KekaHawaii Supreme Court · 2000

381 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API