Kite v. Eckley
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtGivens, J.
— Plaintiff and one Walters executed a promissory note for $5,000 payable to W. L. Eckley. The trial court found on supporting evidence that this note was given without consideration and upon representations, among others, that the note would not have to be paid by the makers, and that Eckley would keep on deposit with it other valuable paper, the proceeds of which would be applied in payment of plaintiff’s note. The note was given for the purpose of enlarging Eckley’s credit, and was immediately negotiated by him to J. W. Laubenheim. Thereafter Eckley deposited with Laubenheim as security…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Sills v. . FordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
- Edwards v. City Nat. Bank of McAlesterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
- Boughton v. HarderAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899
- Goldstein v. Union Nat. Bank of DallasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1919
- Martin v. SmithIdaho Supreme Court · 1921
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Ticor Title Co. v. StanionIdaho Supreme Court · 2007
- Berkshire Investments, LLC v. TaylorIdaho Supreme Court · 2012
- Taylor v. MaileIdaho Supreme Court · 2005
- Foster v. City of St. AnthonyIdaho Supreme Court · 1992
- Weldon v. Bonner County Tax CoalitionIdaho Supreme Court · 1993
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.