Legal Opinion
Goldstein v. Union National Bank
Texas Supreme Court
Decided June 11, 1919No. 2525PublishedCited by 68 opinions
Question certified from the Court of Civil Appeals for the Fifth District, in an appeal from Dallas County.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hawkins
From our Court of Civil Appeals for the Fifth Supreme Judicial District come the following statement and certified question:
“The Union National Bank of Dallas instituted this suit against appellant and I. B. Walker on a promissory note for the sum of $5000, dated August 30, 1909, payable to said bank or order on demand, and bearing interest at the rate of eight per cent per annum from maturity. On May 20, 1911, the appellee, Commonwealth National Bank of Dallas, intervened in the suit, setting up that it had purchased the note, that it was the. legal and equitable owner and holder thereof and…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Gold-Mining Co. v. National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Cragie v. . HadleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
- Innerarity v. Merchants' National BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1885
- Holden v. . New York and Erie BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
- Van Winkle Gin & MacHinery Co. v. Citizens' Bank of BuffaloTexas Supreme Court · 1896
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by68 opinions
- International Bankers Life Insurance Co. v. HollowayTexas Supreme Court · 1963
- Official Committee Of The Unsecured Creditors Of Color Tile, Inc. v. Coopers & Lybrand, LlpCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
- Grant Thornton LLP v. Prospect High Income FundTexas Supreme Court · 2010
- Scott v. GardnerTexas Supreme Court · 1941
- Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of Color Tile, Inc. v. Coopers & Lybrand, LLPCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.