Legal Opinion

Lindberg v. Fasching

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided August 19, 2003No. C7-03-242PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MINGE, Judge.

Appellant challenges a summary judgment determination that an easement over his land is valid despite the lack of a filed notice of the easement, which is required by the Marketable Title Act. The district court found that because of the scope of the easement, and because respondent and his predecessors had used the easement, they had had adequate possession of the premises to meet the exception to the filed-notice requirement of the Marketable Title Act. Because there is a genuine issue of material fact whether the use of the easement constituted “possession” within the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Cooper v. FrenchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  2. Fabio v. BellomoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
  3. Lefto v. Hoggsbreath Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
  4. Wichelman v. MessnerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
  5. City of Virginia v. Northland Office Properties Ltd. PartnershipCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Sampair v. Village of BirchwoodSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
  2. Graves v. WaymanCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2012
  3. Jeffrey Apitz v. Terry HopkinsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015
  4. Sampair v. Village of BirchwoodSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API