Legal Opinion

State of Minnesota v. Leona Rose deLottinville

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 15, 2017No. A15-1481PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LILLEHAUG, Justice.

This case presents the question of whether police, having obtained an arrest warrant, are required by the United States Constitution or the Minnesota Constitution to obtain a search warrant to enter a third party’s home to arrest the subject of the arrest warrant. Because we conclude that a search warrant is not required, we affirm.

In 2015, appellant Leona Rose deLottin-ville was arrested and charged by complaint with two felonies: fifth-degree possession of methamphetamine and storing methamphetamine paraphernalia in the presence of a child. In ordering…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. California v. Hodari D.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Alderman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. Minnesota v. OlsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1990

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. Martin (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2017
  2. City of Golden Valley v. WiebesickSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2017
  3. State of Minnesota v. Kristi Dannette McneillySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2024
  4. State v. AtwoodSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2019
  5. State v. AtwoodCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2018

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API